From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Aug 20 23:11:43 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA14462 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 23:11:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns0.iticom.net ([207.49.135.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id XAA14456 for ; Thu, 20 Aug 1998 23:11:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from trouble@webfyre.com) Received: from webfyre.com by ns0.iticom.net ; Fri, 21 Aug 1998 06:11:31 +000 Message-ID: <35DD1D2B.64FD4781@webfyre.com> Date: Fri, 21 Aug 1998 02:09:32 -0500 From: "Security Mgr." Reply-To: trouble@webfyre.com X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2CAM-19980716-SNAP i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: telecom1@erols.com CC: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NT vs FreeBSD References: <35DD0005.68C1@erols.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Geeee This is going to be HARD..... heheheheh {{GRIN}}!! > Questions: > --------- > > 1.) Ease of Use (Administration) FreeBSD .... allows more control over what you are trying to do or accomplish. > 2.) Software Compatibility Issues (cgi's, perl scripts, C > programs, etc.) FreeBSD .... all capable under freebsd with no installation hassles, also tcl, python, java ;) > 3.) Re-booting Issues FreeBSD.... turn it on and let it run forever..... even after you install new software > 4.) Security (Which is more secure?) FreeBSD is far far more secure, NT doesnt know the meaning of security > 5.) FreeBSD w/ Apache OR Website Pro for NT? > which is better & why? FreeBSD and apache ..... more throuput, easier to upgrade, and understand, also much faster at serving requests > 6.) Anything else I forgot to mention. FreeBSD.............................. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message