From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 20 20:33:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86472DB6; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C0BE898; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.124]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 28E1CB94A; Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:33:32 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Konstantin Belousov Subject: Re: svn commit: r277421 - head/sys/powerpc/powerpc Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:26:39 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.4-CBSD-20140415; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201501201621.t0KGLx26096724@svn.freebsd.org> <20150120191438.GL42409@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20150120191438.GL42409@kib.kiev.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201501201526.39169.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Tue, 20 Jan 2015 15:33:32 -0500 (EST) Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Nathan Whitehorn X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2015 20:33:33 -0000 On Tuesday, January 20, 2015 2:14:38 pm Konstantin Belousov wrote: > This is not an acquisition, to be pedantic. Really, it is cdevsw which > has D_NEEDGIANT flag which acquires Giant. After architectures get > rid of GIANT_REQUIRED, flag can be removed. We could #ifdef the flag, but only if it is a meaningful difference for a real world use case. -- John Baldwin