From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 11:17:19 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219E816A4BF for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:17:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rootlabs.com (root.org [67.118.192.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0E88743FFD for ; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:17:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from nate@rootlabs.com) Received: (qmail 67879 invoked by uid 1000); 4 Sep 2003 18:17:18 -0000 Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:17:18 -0700 (PDT) From: Nate Lawson To: Harald Schmalzbauer In-Reply-To: <200308282158.13466@harrymail> Message-ID: <20030904111601.T67448@root.org> References: <20030825141808.F18481@root.org> <200308260152.08643@harrymail> <20030827154324.K33442@root.org> <200308282158.13466@harrymail> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Please test: USB floppies X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 18:17:19 -0000 On Thu, 28 Aug 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > On Thursday 28 August 2003 21:35, Nate Lawson wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Aug 2003, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > > > On Monday 25 August 2003 23:19, Nate Lawson wrote: > > > > If anyone has a USB floppy drive that is giving them problems, please > > > > let me know. > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > this one needs NO_SYNC I think. > > > > > > Played a bit some time ago but had no luck (I'm no programmer) > > > > > > port 1 addr 2: full speed, power 500 mA, config 1, NEC USB > > > UF000x(0x0040), NEC(0x0409), rev 1.23 > > *SNIP* > > > > > Have you tried it again since early August? Also, what is the exact > > behavior when you try to mount or read it? > > Mounting, reading writing and umounting is working without errors, just these > warnings. > > Here are the one from today's world: > umass0: NEC NEC USB UF000x, rev 1.10/1.23, addr 4 > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): INQUIRY. CDB: 12 0 0 0 24 0 > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM Status: SCSI Status Error > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI Status: Check Condition > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): UNIT ATTENTION asc:29,0 > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Power on, reset, or bus device reset occurred > (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Retrying Command (per Sense Data) > da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 > da0: Removable Direct Access SCSI-0 device > da0: 1.000MB/s transfers > da0: 1MB (2880 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 1C) > umass0: Unsupported UFI command 0x35 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x6, scsi status > == 0x0 > umass0: Unsupported UFI command 0x35 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x6, scsi status > == 0x0 > umass0: Unsupported UFI command 0x35 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x6, scsi status > == 0x0 > umass0: Unsupported UFI command 0x35 > (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): Synchronize cache failed, status == 0x6, scsi status > == 0x0 While annoying, if your device doesn't hang or fail to operate, it does not need a quirk. So far, I have had no reports of USB devices with old quirks actually failing when their quirks were disabled. Once again, anything under DA_OLD_QUIRKS will be removed after the release. -Nate