Date: Sun, 29 Nov 1998 20:07:06 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> To: Paolo Di Francesco <paipai@tin.it> Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Huzzah! Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811292003340.1605-100000@bright.fx.genx.net> In-Reply-To: <19981130005426.UZGZ16980.fep02-svc@winworkstation>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 30 Nov 1998, Paolo Di Francesco wrote: > > > That's the first I've heard of the death of the gcc project. Tell me > > > more. > > > > Hmm, Maybe i misread the pages at cygnus... but, egcs does seem to > > be a more worked on project. Or it may just appear that way because > > they release snapshots so often. > > Maybe. Gcc development is very "static"... static or stagnant? :) > > We don't like egcs because... > > why? > > > > I don't like it very much because it's not so stable, and it is a "commercial > product". We'll maybe it's not properly commercial but... It's GPL, same as gcc. True it is a more moving target, but we don't have to use egcs-current, we could use a more stable snapshot, picking the snapshot is a dillema though. > > > I'm trying to avoid playing musical compilers :) > > > > ???? > ala' "musical chairs" meaning i have 2.7.2.2 sorta working, but i'm being told to use 2.8.1 when i'd rather really be using egcs... ~/o doo bee doo bee dooooo ~/o :) -Alfred > > > Ciao Ciao > Paolo Di Francesco > _ > ->B<- All Recycled Bytes Message ... > ~ > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811292003340.1605-100000>