Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 02:29:03 -0700 From: Joel Ray Holveck <joelh@juniper.net> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: alc@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> Subject: Re: RFC: which patch is preferred for fix to PR#165923 Message-ID: <06CD28BD-97DE-4E36-A5E3-831386E3F523@juniper.net> In-Reply-To: <1615948459.2113806.1333381510230.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> References: <1615948459.2113806.1333381510230.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 02 Apr 2012, at 8:45, Rick Macklem wrote: > Joel argued that the credential reference in vm_object_t wasn't NFS = specific > for the same reason. (ie. He felt it might be useful for other = filesystems, > such as smbfs. He had at least one other one, but I can't remember = which one;-) NFS, smbfs, and nwfs (NetWare) were the three that I identified in = 8.3-RC1 (based on a brief grep for curthread). They looked like they = had copied it from NFS (down to "/* XXX */" next to where they set the = creds from curthread), and they did pass that cred down, but I didn't = look closely at where it was ultimately used. I didn't look at anything in ports. joelh=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?06CD28BD-97DE-4E36-A5E3-831386E3F523>