From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan  7 05:59:08 2015
Return-Path: <owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033)
 id D9FB0D2F; Wed,  7 Jan 2015 05:59:08 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 05:59:08 +0000
From: Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org>
To: Emanuel Haupt <ehaupt@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: svn commit: r376393 - in head/dns: dnswall nslint tinystats
 vizone zonenotify
Message-ID: <20150107055908.GA99367@FreeBSD.org>
References: <201501060937.t069bSxD097911@svn.freebsd.org>
 <20150106153109.GA93278@FreeBSD.org>
 <20150106184407.f0063f82e5ad6cc6f654338f@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20150106184407.f0063f82e5ad6cc6f654338f@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org,
 ports-committers@freebsd.org
X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head
 <svn-ports-head.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-ports-head/>
List-Post: <mailto:svn-ports-head@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-head>,
 <mailto:svn-ports-head-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 05:59:09 -0000

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 06:44:07PM +0100, Emanuel Haupt wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev <danfe@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > explain what had happened to CRITICAL?  These commit messages tell
> > nothing above that can't be figured from the diff itself...
> 
> It MASTER_SITES_CRITICAL was a group of my own servers which I have to
> decommission very soon.
> 
> I got permission from clusteradm@ to host the distfiles in LOCAL/ehaupt
> instead.

Yeah, I've seen your follow-up later in the thread.  Thanks for explaining
it in more detail.

> I'm a bit surprised how much noise this series of commits created.

I don't see anything to be surprised about: 1) commits violated 30/70
rule (leaving aside their quantity) and 2) phk@ had explained it all to
us 15 years ago. :)

./danfe