From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Feb 16 09:21:14 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F3452FD01; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DfwSp1B5nz3Jxs; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1613467274; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PqIX0ksDskRZrYfhvlYRFaaFNDQh+/wFkoFxkO2M3u8=; b=gxiMXOwwkhJyft4/nArQ/L7xb33HzwprY/GXjTgmWaOqSvFwAjRB5A6hoQsAprckDuVh1S wAoATh131PYxmPqnrqbg5D+hzaD6r0/H6uro1w9++oiiwPzGNvL/d547uupfCF8eeWjbFB GFcR6hkffgRD39CgP+Urfz6lBoLh8ichIMFSHLs1sbFbfKZH+qN+0+/XqQVBtsKGon0fmv DJGtL9DcEYKbRQ4ADMkOkF0LjCW6/flMHAQxT/CgnoXX+VNMF2dnly1gwi5aPPG47wYX6I 2vid4ty3oW0AMrNWewJzCnNpVFuQT0b6qo/EXzIU8+DhKA8UwVCKe3HXcDqWSw== Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 1006A1ECC7; Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:21:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:21:14 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: Mathieu Arnold , "Tobias C. Berner" , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r565221 - in head: . misc/hwdata misc/pnpids Message-ID: <20210216092113.GA78911@FreeBSD.org> References: <202102141234.11ECYrx3027630@repo.freebsd.org> <20210214132857.GA89961@FreeBSD.org> <20210215090549.zad3k3xkahbtiyy3@aching.in.mat.cc> <20210216085705.zt2qcm6rrpcypnfk@aching.in.mat.cc> <20210216090337.e5zehk5xadmubwga@aniel.nours.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20210216090337.e5zehk5xadmubwga@aniel.nours.eu> ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1613467274; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PqIX0ksDskRZrYfhvlYRFaaFNDQh+/wFkoFxkO2M3u8=; b=e25CM90jSQ1tdAvIWSE3cY9NqTQUy0Kc+sFlz9cpFgSXqBMpcEVy2ckqwKDiDNd3b+c4B2 hbWGqMAOiv1sFXKFu/YS/WLNNbg6p71nYsL4Uzvd0b1t3dr+NuzP494UnKFnVi7xspF8sg Sh2Oh0XBSR6wjk9CXzU0pZAKqaGZyUMvT73qvyURiaAgFnvYvV+9NRgrEhG5VKyzc0YE2g WucrxyYnuvuuoXDbUciaIdtQkDfLkAyNLZEeNUGMdRNm7Sv44dk6f29CQJRby5dPbQWTgH +vUy7DT6chMfLvxKuegSM1XT4VgiIBHDx9Bc/sd8WZwCwdX85TYNAsvB4YDjgg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1613467274; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=fRUq3cza55C+tGaF/X0LkZ0JIczIw8LyVZh4Bbkdw/+v+0N1AfxS5JVaRdsnKXArZ58aES iOh7V6rbw0kttdDhAIBJDZKMS3iUFgN0fUIOV/7GpekY1gLuM4XrStnCmDKpfE0AeklKhD sIOT3jtyLn+m9HDLoHJw2m+r2VPA7wOpwe85sk3kl4j5vxvoITuHrBBPQ+zeBf6lXqbTYk 3fLyJy4w/kgoFdZWQF+DZuDw3qOrCyjd/PFkTk+FByDkRc8hJRhNSWbVdtGO7AMrYbPX45 pVxpN3IjB5jTWha04vHMciIDVjopFj4cCrLsN75Ndtu/2hSqrrqlQJH2pRoLPg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2021 09:21:14 -0000 On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 10:03:37AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:57:05AM +0100, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 10:48:30PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > ... > > > How so? The port has a new name, a new origin, etc, it is a totally > > > different package now > > > > Yes, but when we introduce the PKGMOVED file to handle package renames, > > like we talked about, it will be required. > > Yes and in that case pkg will just reinstall the new package because it > has been renamed and ignore the version schema, so we can reset portepoch In fact, this (ability to reset version numbers upon package rename) should be one of the design requirements IMHO. ./danfe