From owner-freebsd-questions  Mon Feb  5 14:00:28 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id OAA29403
          for questions-outgoing; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:00:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tick.SSEC.WISC.EDU (tick.ssec.wisc.edu [144.92.108.121])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA29395
          for <questions@freebsd.org>; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 14:00:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tick.SSEC.WISC.EDU (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tick.SSEC.WISC.EDU (8.7.1/8.7.1) with ESMTP id PAA18200; Mon, 5 Feb 1996 15:58:46 -0600 (CST)
From: Dave Glowacki <dglo@SSEC.WISC.EDU>
Message-Id: <199602052158.PAA18200@tick.SSEC.WISC.EDU>
X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.5 12/11/95
To: "Garrett A. Wollman" <wollman@lcs.mit.edu>
cc: Marco Masotti <mc7953@mclink.it>, questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IP Masquerading 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Feb 1996 13:27:10 EST."
             <9602051827.AA04116@halloran-eldar.lcs.mit.edu> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 05 Feb 1996 15:58:41 -0600
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
Precedence: bulk

> > Now, IP masquerading is true for Linux, and quite proven to work in my own
> > trials, but my question is about freeBSD, wondering whether the same kind of
> > support is or will be planned in the future.
> 
> Not if I have anything to do with it.

Because...?