From owner-freebsd-current Thu Jan 28 23:59:04 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA08952 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:59:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA08947 for ; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:59:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.2/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA06896; Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:59:15 -0800 (PST) To: Peter Wemm cc: Bruce Evans , chris@netmonger.net, current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: btokup().. patch to STYLE(9) (fwd) In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 29 Jan 1999 11:59:53 +0800." <199901290359.LAA21875@spinner.netplex.com.au> Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1999 23:59:14 -0800 Message-ID: <6892.917596754@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > style(9) is not KNF, and never was intended to be. It's a FreeBSD style > guide that bears similarity to KNF because that's what it used as a > starting point. I think we can safely presume that Bruce has been overruled on this one. If the collective definition is different than his, and it seems to be, then the collective definition prevails. I very much enjoy the work Bruce does in keeping us honest in various ways, but I don't recall ever handing him the keys to the city and carte blanche over all commits. :-) - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message