Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 11:48:23 -0500 From: Dan <dan-freebsd-fs@ourbrains.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Will XFS be adopted Message-ID: <20081120164823.GA8513@ourbrains.org> In-Reply-To: <86bpwcp1d8.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <20081109174303.GA5146@ourbrains.org> <20081109184349.GG51239@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <4920D879.3070806@jrv.org> <20081117050441.GA16855@ourbrains.org> <20081118175210.GA3753@hyperion.scode.org> <20081119001742.GA21835@ourbrains.org> <49235D86.4050106@modulus.org> <86bpwcp1d8.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav(des@des.no)@2008.11.19 09:26:59 +0100: > Andrew Snow <andrew@modulus.org> writes: > > [...] I would wait until it has been considered stable and moved into > > the 7-STABLE tree before deploying a production server. > > ZFS has been in 7 for over a year. > > DES > -- > Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav - des@des.no But is it considered stable? :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20081120164823.GA8513>