From owner-cvs-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 10 20:30:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Delivered-To: cvs-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977C316A420; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:30:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joel@FreeBSD.org) Received: from av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B09143D46; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:30:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from joel@FreeBSD.org) Received: by av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id C746E37ED2; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:30:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net [81.228.9.101]) by av6-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8507537E48; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:30:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from t4o955p64.telia.com (t4o955p64.telia.com [195.252.53.184]) by smtp3-1-sn3.vrr.skanova.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECB0837E43; Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:30:24 +0100 (CET) From: Joel Dahl To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20060210181249.GA949@flame.pc> References: <200602091800.k19I0gHR024988@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060210171224.GI21499@submonkey.net> <1139592139.790.7.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <200602101235.54875.jhb@freebsd.org> <1139594811.954.14.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> <20060210181249.GA949@flame.pc> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:30:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1139603433.954.29.camel@dude.automatvapen.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org, Ceri Davies , doc-committers@freebsd.org, John Baldwin , cvs-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors contrib.committers.sgml contrib.develalumni.sgml X-BeenThere: cvs-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the doc and www trees List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:30:28 -0000 On Fri, 2006-02-10 at 20:12 +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-02-10 19:06, Joel Dahl wrote: > >> You can use common sense though. He was obviously a ports committer. > > > > Guys, I'm lost. What are we arguing about? > > > > He was a ports committer, but I fail to see how that is important since > > the Development Team Alumni doesn't differentiate between different > > types of commit bits? > > > > Maybe I was a bit unclear with the meaning of the "unclassified commit > > bit" comment; it's just a reminder, since they're still in our access > > files. :-) > > No arguing from me. I mentioned he was the ports-meister, just in > case the `unclassified' comment was meant to be a reminder of ``we > don't know what this guy was working on''. > > It's obvious that the comment is not, since it only mentions names > listed in access.unclassified, so there's nothing to argue about. Yep, everyone who is in access.unclassified has the "unclassified commit bit" comment next to their name in the SGML source, but I can understand if some people were confused by the "unclassified" discussion, especially if they believed that asami was the only one who had that comment next to his name. :-) -- Joel - joel at FreeBSD dot org