From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 17 08:18:03 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93FF54E0557 for ; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 08:18:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DJSTl2R10z4b9T; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 08:18:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@freebsd.org) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.94 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1l13G2-000GBc-Jo; Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:17:58 +0100 Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 09:17:58 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Steve Wills Cc: Pau Amma , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Removing sysutils/polkit dependency from sysutils/libudisks? Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4DJSTl2R10z4b9T X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.00 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; ASN(0.00)[asn:12502, ipnet:2001:14f8::/32, country:DE] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Jan 2021 08:18:03 -0000 Hi! > Personally, I'm still very much of the opinion that the less polkit is > used the better. Can you tell us the reason behind this opinion ? Is it generally buggy, does polkit violate some general design policy for apps etc ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 Now what ?