From owner-freebsd-questions Thu Oct 29 16:11:28 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA19441 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:11:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from horst.bfd.com (horst.bfd.com [12.9.219.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA19436 for ; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:11:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Received: from HARLIE.bfd.com (bastion.bfd.com [12.9.219.14]) by horst.bfd.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA00414; Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:11:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ejs@bfd.com) Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 16:11:08 -0800 (PST) From: "Eric J. Schwertfeger" To: Scott Donovan cc: Steve Friedrich , "questions@FreeBSD.ORG" , Timothy J Luoma Subject: Re: Windows NT Serial Communication Driver In-Reply-To: <3.0.5.32.19981030104420.00a1cba0@mersey.nt.tas.gov.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 30 Oct 1998, Scott Donovan wrote: > Would it be a good idea then to implement RBL spammer blocking on the > various Sendmail servers that host the lists? That way non subscribe people > can post but known spammers will be blocked (not a perfect solution, but > perhaps a happy compromise?) Wouldn't have helped in this case, neither the VIX RBL nor ORBS listed that IP address, because it's not a spam house, just a spam source, someone spamming their own product. (yes, my filters check every IP address in the Received: headers against both lists). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message