Date: Fri, 16 Jun 1995 21:37:52 +0200 From: Mark Murray <mark@grondar.za> To: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Cc: mark@grondar.za (Mark Murray), FreeBSD-current@FreeBSD.Org Subject: Re: DES, crypt and eBones Message-ID: <199506161937.VAA14966@grumble.grondar.za>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> telnet[d] with kerberization should go in eBones, since eBones was > to replace the kerberization stuff supplied by 4.4BSD lite. Garrett > had some grand plan here, but has dropped the ball when the eBones > stuff was done (Not his fault, this was taken over by some one else > who has been unavaliable to maintain it). So I take that going ahead and moving this (telnet[d]) will not be considered a hostile action? ;-) (I won't do any committing for a while - just till I get the feel of it). BTW - was the other person by any chance Geoff Rehmet? I have chatted to him on the phone and emailed him (A while back). You're right - he's busy! > > > Binary sets should match source sets, otherwise you are heading for > > > trouble :-(. > > > > I'd buy this if there was not so much crosstalk between the packages. > > Solutions? One possible one is to move libraries to secure? (yuk) > > I need a better picture in my head of just what is going on in there > right now. I have not looked at that part of the tree since it was > changed from the original 4.4 lite code and am not so sure that the > initial change was a good idea at all... You preferred the actual Kerberos? I know someone in Britain who has a 4.4 CDROM with this on and I could do a replacement job... M -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199506161937.VAA14966>