From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 13 00:18:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1FF106564A for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED9A8FC0C for ; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:18:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-222.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.222]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D3A1E1B3; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:18:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oAD0I3lN002731; Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:18:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 01:18:03 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Charlie Kester Message-Id: <20101113011803.abd5b82c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101112235746.GH13998@comcast.net> References: <20101112192954.GB18437@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101112223810.GA19635@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101112232954.GA41199@guilt.hydra> <20101112235746.GH13998@comcast.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Nov 2010 00:18:06 -0000 On Fri, 12 Nov 2010 15:57:46 -0800, Charlie Kester wrote: > On Fri 12 Nov 2010 at 15:44:01 PST Chris Brennan wrote: > >Must we continue to beat this already dead horse? > > Apparently the answer is yes, when we're not beating the equally > dead horse of the CLI vs GUI debate. Why "vs"? It's "and". So let's have the "vs" vs "and" debate. And as we are already on-topic, let's discuss which logical operator is the best, maybe we find an alternative to "vs" or "and"... or... yes, what about "or"? :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...