From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Nov  6 13:53:31 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D33175
 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  6 Nov 2013 13:53:31 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from joerg@britannica.bec.de)
Received: from mo6-p00-ob.rzone.de (mo6-p00-ob.rzone.de
 [IPv6:2a01:238:20a:202:5300::1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A269B2136
 for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Wed,  6 Nov 2013 13:53:30 +0000 (UTC)
X-RZG-AUTH: :JiIXek6mfvEEUpFQdo7Fj1/zg48CFjWjQv0cW+St/nW/afgnrylsiWy0bTV9rgkJ
X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00
Received: from britannica.bec.de
 (ip-109-45-222-180.web.vodafone.de [109.45.222.180])
 by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 32.12 DYNA|AUTH)
 with (TLSv1.0:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 000b45pA6DrR0FA ;
 Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:53:27 +0100 (CET)
Received: by britannica.bec.de (sSMTP sendmail emulation);
 Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:53:26 +0100
Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2013 14:53:26 +0100
From: Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de>
To: cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: SSE2 intrinsics: gcc46 vs. clang contradiction
Message-ID: <20131106135326.GB29109@britannica.bec.de>
Mail-Followup-To: cfe-commits@cs.uiuc.edu, hackers@FreeBSD.org
References: <20131101124645.GA73456@regency.nsu.ru>
 <20131101154320.GA11359@regency.nsu.ru>
 <52742115.9010404@pathscale.com>
 <A7CD3ADC-872C-40D7-B48A-C0C1A8FA885A@FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <A7CD3ADC-872C-40D7-B48A-C0C1A8FA885A@FreeBSD.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
 <freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-hackers>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
 <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Nov 2013 13:53:31 -0000

On Sat, Nov 02, 2013 at 01:07:47AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> Index: tools/clang/lib/Headers/emmintrin.h
> ===================================================================
> --- tools/clang/lib/Headers/emmintrin.h (revision 193039)
> +++ tools/clang/lib/Headers/emmintrin.h (working copy)
> @@ -1366,7 +1366,7 @@ _mm_movepi64_pi64(__m128i __a)
>  }
> 
>  static __inline__ __m128i __attribute__((__always_inline__, __nodebug__))
> -_mm_movpi64_pi64(__m64 __a)
> +_mm_movpi64_epi64(__m64 __a)
>  {
>    return (__m128i){ (long long)__a, 0 };
>  }
> 
> Is this OK?

Comparing the naming schema of the others, this looks good.

Joerg