From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 8 00:00:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B2C106566B for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:00:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from fg-out-1718.google.com (fg-out-1718.google.com [72.14.220.158]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5FB8FC15 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2009 00:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by fg-out-1718.google.com with SMTP id 22so930949fge.12 for ; Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:00:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1yqZDcMMk4dAGk+GypxR8qEDySkMDAggJYb2xTMqeYg=; b=QygrwALhu5QdRzoLCL3HHfuWd/dW+YPNH9wKwwH72fR2bEaie7bufzA2j+vGoxpjcP yTvUtJXAfVMcgSoDCJRXxo9SiJRSD35opxKuasO/8rQROX10K4VN0vbbDWZPMm5L0Cau vBH35QcAtRzc6KMx9LITKb25eSJ+ckJeJ9cz8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bkEUEBv70VJy1VFztODTJxAhpTIdx3T8OrNM2IXI9JjEDzMTvYeAVOjmfwtMCweWJN OEUapP0vXM8/dSjoeBKrKYNh415kdXw0J7Ms8AAWcSvA70sBlCR3aeMLnDJ8O+nebsKS IlpnXpdFXBBgcNE60h+2Or2Jrhwzvx10zw3+4= Received: by 10.86.91.13 with SMTP id o13mr6593004fgb.7.1244419246907; Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:00:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 12sm613198fgg.25.2009.06.07.17.00.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:00:43 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 01:00:37 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090608010037.3c3623d6@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <81475023@h30.sp.ipt.ru> References: <81475023@h30.sp.ipt.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.1 (GTK+ 2.16.2; i386-portbld-freebsd7.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: [x11/nvidia-driver] conflicts with linux dri ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:48 -0000 On Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:06:56 +0400 Boris Samorodov wrote: > On Sun, 7 Jun 2009 21:34:53 +0200 barbara wrote: > > > > I've just received a report at emulation@ about x11/nvidia-driver > > > and other linux dri ports to be in conflict. > > > > > > If a linux dri port is installed x11/nvidia-driver seems to > > > replace libGL.so with a link to nvidia library. Not good. Is it > > > right to mark this port and other linux dri ports to be in > > > conflict? > > > Why it's not good? > > I'm not sure I've understood, but I think it's more or less the > > same with the native counterpart: if you install x11/nvidia-driver, > > libGL.so from graphics/libGL get replaced (actually renamed). > > Because if port B replaces a file from port A, then when port A is > deinstalled, the file from the ports B is removed. It's not ideal, but making nvidia-driver conflict with its own dependencies is a lot worse.