From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Oct 30 15:36:09 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id PAA20968 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 15:36:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-isp) Received: from wireless.wdc.net (wireless.wdc.net [204.140.136.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id PAA20962 for ; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 15:36:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bad@uhf.wireless.net) Received: from uhf.wireless.net (uhf.wdc.net [198.147.74.44]) by wireless.wdc.net (8.8.8/8.8.4) with ESMTP id PAA18564; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 15:36:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (bad@localhost) by uhf.wireless.net (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA01927; Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:38:26 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 30 Oct 1997 18:38:25 -0500 (EST) From: Bernie Doehner To: Lukas Wunner cc: andrew@pubnix.net, kbrown@primelink.com, tomthai@future.net, dnelson@slip.net, rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com, danny@panda.hilink.com.au, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Wireless Services In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > Here in Germany (or rather, in all ETSI countries), the EIRP regulations > are very strict, so even with the 18 dBi antennas, you cannot go > further than about 2.5 km. According to a guy from BreezeCom, in China > there are no regulations whatsoever wrt transmission power, so these guys > are more or less roasting the birds on their antennas. IIRC, the guy spoke > of 60W. The US version has 1W if I am not mistaken. Hmmm. I wonder if the Chinese version is modifiable for the 2.3 GHz. ham band? (Anyone going to China anytime soon and willing to bring me back one???) :) Bernie