Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2001 13:50:14 -0600 From: seebs@plethora.net (Peter Seebach) To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setting memory allocators for library functions. Message-ID: <200102261950.f1QJoE612168@guild.plethora.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 27 Feb 2001 03:32:56 %2B0900." <3A9AA158.61669F11@newsguy.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3A9AA158.61669F11@newsguy.com>, "Daniel C. Sobral" writes: >Anyway, these are two very different situations, and comparing them is >silly. They are situations in which an application can be killed and has no way to detect that it is about to do something wrong, and in which there *was* a correct way to notify the application of impending doom. Once we accept the argument "the C standard doesn't say this doesn't cause a segmentation fault", we can apply it to everything. -s To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200102261950.f1QJoE612168>