Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2005 09:14:37 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jeremy C. Reed" <reed@reedmedia.net> To: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Negative Review of FreeBSD 5.4 Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.43.0506030911140.509-100000@pilchuck.reedmedia.net> In-Reply-To: <d7pl0g$2f8f$1@kemoauc.mips.inka.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 3 Jun 2005, Christian Weisgerber wrote: > It turns out that writing reviews that meet the expectation of > expert readers is incredibly difficult. In fact, I suggest that > some of the people who keep lambasting reviews try writing some > themselves. For bonus, about an operating system you're only > semi-familiar with. When writing a review, make a list of topics, features and tasks ahead of time that you want to check and document that. The review should be clear to explain what the initial goals were. I have written several reviews. And I have received negative and abusive feedback also. There's always someone who can find fault even if you try to do an honest, thorough and good job. Jeremy C. Reed BSD News, BSD tutorials, BSD links http://www.bsdnewsletter.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.LNX.4.43.0506030911140.509-100000>