Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2007 21:50:53 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan <gabor@FreeBSD.org> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bsd.port.options.mk status Message-ID: <46E44E9D.8000102@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070909194620.GB14713@hades.panopticon> References: <20070909194620.GB14713@hades.panopticon>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dmitry Marakasov escribió: > Hi! > > CHANGES of 20060930 state that exeperimental bsd.port.options.mk has > been added for OPTIONS to be able to influence dependencies. I need that > feature for some of my ports, so I wanted to know what's the status for > it? > > .include <bsd.port.options.mk> doesn't work, but using full path works, > and makes it possible to use things like USE_QT_VER or USE_SDL > conditionally depending on what OPTIONS are set. > > So, is it possible to use this feature, or are there still any issues > not allowing use of options.mk in ports? > > I don't know the answer either, I just want to add to the topic, that it would be really nice if someone with the knowledge could add some pieces of info about this to PH, so that we avoid the future confusions. TIA, -- Gabor Kovesdan FreeBSD Volunteer EMAIL: gabor@FreeBSD.org .:|:. gabor@kovesdan.org WEB: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~gabor .:|:. http://kovesdan.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46E44E9D.8000102>