From owner-freebsd-smp  Sat Oct  4 18:16:25 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-smp>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA17538
          for smp-outgoing; Sat, 4 Oct 1997 18:16:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from consys.com (consys.com [209.60.202.194])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA17515;
          Sat, 4 Oct 1997 18:16:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cssunix.conceptual.com (cssunix.conceptual.com [10.0.2.5])
	by consys.com (8.8.6/8.8.6) with ESMTP id SAA00917;
	Sat, 4 Oct 1997 18:16:13 -0700 (MST)
Received: (from rcarter@localhost)
	by cssunix.conceptual.com (8.8.5/8.8.6) id SAA29007;
	Sat, 4 Oct 1997 18:16:13 -0700 (MST)
Date: Sat, 4 Oct 1997 18:16:13 -0700 (MST)
From: "Russell L. Carter" <rcarter@consys.com>
Message-Id: <199710050116.SAA29007@cssunix.conceptual.com>
To: dcarmich@mcs.com, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Building parallel "Beowulf-style" supercomputers with FreeBSD
Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Yes.

Now it is a curious thing that NFS server perf. is not considered,
but such is life.

In fact, there are lots of interesting questions to be asked,
but, who am I to ask them?

:-)

Cheers,
Russell