From owner-cvs-all Sat Feb 9 7:35:54 2002 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from omega.lovett.com (omega.lovett.com [209.249.90.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6576737B400; Sat, 9 Feb 2002 07:35:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from [24.243.55.247] (helo=[10.0.0.2] ident=ident) by omega.lovett.com with asmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16ZZXN-0004G2-00; Sat, 09 Feb 2002 07:35:37 -0800 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1331 Date: Sat, 09 Feb 2002 09:36:29 -0600 Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/glib13 Makefile ports/devel/glib13/files patch-ag From: Ade Lovett To: Mikhail Teterin Cc: , Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200202090357.g193v3b08699@aldan.algebra.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 02/08/02 21:57, "Mikhail Teterin" wrote: > On 8 Feb, Ade Lovett wrote: >> ade 2002/02/08 11:03:10 PST >> >> Modified files: >> devel/glib13 Makefile >> devel/glib13/files patch-ag >> Log: >> glibconfig.h was getting installed in /, rather than below PREFIX >> and was being compensated for by a post-install target. >> >> Fix the underlying problem, bumping PORTREVISION. > > Sounds like the resulting package did not change, so the revision bump > was not needed. Or am I confused? The package hasn't changed. The port has (it doesn't leave a /glibconfig.h turd lying around any more). The PORTREVISION bump, and the associated commit message should be a heads-up to those that compile from source. -aDe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message