From owner-freebsd-chat  Wed Nov  5 22:02:50 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA19657
          for chat-outgoing; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 22:02:50 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (root@time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id WAA19647
          for <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 22:02:46 -0800 (PST)
          (envelope-from jkh@time.cdrom.com)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (jkh@localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.7/8.6.9) with ESMTP id WAA05420; Wed, 5 Nov 1997 22:02:20 -0800 (PST)
To: Open Systems Networking <opsys@mail.webspan.net>
cc: Mike Smith <mike@smith.net.au>, Graphic Rezidew <rezidew@rezidew.net>,
        freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: WTB: Pentium Pro 180 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 05 Nov 1997 23:02:03 EST."
             <Pine.BSF.3.95.971105225839.3101A-100000@orion.webspan.net> 
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 1997 22:02:20 -0800
Message-ID: <5417.878796140@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Actually I've reconsidered, I was going to use a Tyan tahoe-2 MB and get a
> single Pro and upgrade to another later.
> But seeing as how almost everyone is dropping pro's like a bad habbit im

I don't know which "everyone" you're talking about here, but everyone
I know still favors the P6/200, with its faster cache and ability to
cache above 512MB, for any server of truly serious capacity.  I can
only infer from this that you've been hanging out with the
light-weights again. :-)

					Jordan