Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 8 Apr 2001 13:20:34 -0600
From:      Duke Normandin <01031149@3web.net>
To:        The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: BSDi Acquired by Embedded Computing Firm Wind River
Message-ID:  <20010408132033.A117005@mandy.rockingd.calgary.ab.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104072149030.81918-100000@mobile.hub.org>; from "The Hermit Hacker" on Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 09:51:20PM
References:  <20010407142725.A171295@mandy.rockingd.calgary.ab.ca> <Pine.BSF.4.33.0104072149030.81918-100000@mobile.hub.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Apr 07, 2001 at 09:51:20PM -0300, The Hermit Hacker wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Duke Normandin wrote:
> 
> > I understand your example. Setting aside the issue of kernel support
> > for garbage peripherals a-la Linux for a minute, is FreeBSD's
> > server-centric kernel inherantly not as well suited to perform as a
> > desktop platform as it could be? I realize that folks *are* using
> > FreeBSD as a desktop platform, but are they "forcing" it to do so at
> > the expense of the kernel's rock-solid stability? Bottom-line --
> > should FreeBSD be chosen strictly for use as a server, and Linux as a
> > desktop platform, albeit the latter's instability that *sometimes*
> > occurs in their effort to support as much relevant hardware/software
> > as possible?
> 
> I don't feel that I'm "forcing" myself to do anything ... but, then again,

I didn't mean "forcing" *you* to do anything; rather, "forcing" the
kernel into providing a level of desktop-centric functionalty that
denegrates its otherwise stability. Kinda like asking the question: If I
install a Formula I power train in my home-made shit-box, will I have to
"de-tune" it by slapping a governor on it and removing the supercharger,
i.e., "forcing" it to behave as a "street machine" -- and will
performance and stability be affected? The answer would be "hell yes,
performance will be affected!" -- the engine was built to run at high
RPMs *with* a certain (and finite) complement of peripheral equipment.
Get my meaning?
-- 
-duke

Calgary, Alberta, Canada


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010408132033.A117005>