Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2004 22:06:53 +0100 From: Scott Mitchell <scott+freebsd@fishballoon.org> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: freebsd-standards@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /bin/ls -t and nanoseconds Message-ID: <20040622210653.GB461@tuatara.fishballoon.org> In-Reply-To: <200406211819.i5LIJk93049154@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <20040620180829.GJ462@tuatara.fishballoon.org> <200406211819.i5LIJk93049154@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jun 21, 2004 at 02:19:46PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote: > <<On Sun, 20 Jun 2004 19:08:29 +0100, Scott Mitchell <scott+freebsd@fishballoon.org> said: > > > Does POSIX have anything to say about whether or not '/bin/ls -t' should > > pay attention to the nanoseconds part of the file timestamps? > > POSIX doesn't have anything to say about file timestamps having > nanoseconds parts. Thanks. Our ls now sorts timestamps down to the nanosecond level and does a secondary sort by name when timestamps are equal. Scott -- =========================================================================== Scott Mitchell | PGP Key ID | "Eagles may soar, but weasels Cambridge, England | 0x54B171B9 | don't get sucked into jet engines" scott at fishballoon.org | 0xAA775B8B | -- Anon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040622210653.GB461>