From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 14 17:45:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BCA16A4CE; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:45:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [207.200.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D6143D54; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:45:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 93F8E1430A; Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:45:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 12:45:30 -0500 (CDT) From: Mark Linimon X-X-Sender: linimon@pancho To: Murray Stokely In-Reply-To: <20040714131330.GE66732@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: Ceri Davies cc: doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Handbook Acronyms X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 17:45:31 -0000 On Wed, 14 Jul 2004, Murray Stokely wrote: > Yes the current terms look a bit out of place in the Handbook. There > are mostly developer terms and acronyms from our community mailing lists > at the moment. It's nice to have them somewhere, but they aren't > relevant with the Handbook. Having written a number of the entries, I agree that the current entries are as described, and that it's nice to have them somewhere. I will demur somewhat about them not being relevant with the Handbook, but if we go that way, where else should we move them? The FAQ? mcl