From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 19 20:35:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29A03106567A for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from smtp.sd73.bc.ca (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [142.24.13.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06EC38FC20 for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:35:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADDF61A000B1B for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:35:01 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at smtp.sd73.bc.ca Received: from smtp.sd73.bc.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.sd73.bc.ca [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 5roAQlRSIdAF for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:34:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from coal.local (s10.sbo [192.168.0.10]) by smtp.sd73.bc.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD0E1A000B2D for ; Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:34:55 -0700 (PDT) From: Freddie Cash Organization: School District 73 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 13:34:54 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200803191334.54510.fjwcash@gmail.com> Subject: "established" on { tcp or udp } rules X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 20:35:02 -0000 Just curious if the following rule will work correctly. It is accepted by the ipfw command. In the process of working out a test for it, but thought I'd ask here as well, just to be sure. ipfw add { tcp or udp } from me to any 53 out xmit fxp0 ipfw add { tcp or udp } from any 53 to me in recv fxp0 established Will the UDP packets go through correctly, even though "established" has no meaning for UDP streams, and the ipfw command will barf if you use it with just "ipfw add udp" rules? -- Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com