From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Jan 12 11:51:42 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA02049 for freebsd-smp-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:51:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from isbalham.ist.co.uk (isbalham.ist.co.uk [192.31.26.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA02027; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:51:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from gid.co.uk (uucp@localhost) by isbalham.ist.co.uk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with UUCP id TAA07388; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:50:30 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.2] by seagoon.gid.co.uk; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:42:37 GMT X-Sender: rb@194.32.164.1 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:42:35 +0000 To: greg@uswest.net From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: Fatal Trap Cc: freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 8:28 am -0600 12/1/99, Greg Rowe wrote: >They are 2940UW's Revision C. I had 2940UW revision E's in, but I replaced >them >thinking that was the issue. I can build the system with a Generic kernel, >single CPU, and do the tar load with no problems, so it appears to be an SMP >issue ??? A dmesg output follows: Some 2940s (but not the UW, IIRC) misbehave with some MP motherboards. http://www.adaptec.com/support might be worth a quick look. -- Bob Bishop (0118) 977 4017 international code +44 118 rb@gid.co.uk fax (0118) 989 4254 between 0800 and 1800 UK To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message