From owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 12 13:44:26 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3758C16A468 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:44:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mailr4.de.ignite.net (mailr4.de.ignite.net [62.134.11.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD20813C45E for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from news@nermal.rz1.convenimus.net) Received: from mailr3.de.ignite.net (mailr3.de.ignite.net [62.134.11.18]) by mailr4.de.ignite.net (Switch-3.1.9/Switch-3.1.7) with ESMTP id l6CDCsDJ008923 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:12:54 +0200 (MEST) Received: from nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (c-134-228-165.d.dsl.de.ignite.net [62.134.228.165]) by mailr3.de.ignite.net (Switch-3.1.9/Switch-3.1.7) with SMTP id l6CDCe6m012614 for ; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:12:52 +0200 (MEST) Received: by nermal.rz1.convenimus.net (Postfix, from userid 8) id 74E6315213; Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:12:35 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: Christian Baer Newsgroups: gmane.os.freebsd.security.general Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 15:12:35 +0200 (CEST) Organization: Convenimus Projekt Lines: 21 Message-ID: References: <20070710102644.GA2017@mud2.stack.nl> NNTP-Posting-Host: garfield.rz1.convenimus.net X-Trace: nermal.rz1.convenimus.net 1184245955 91692 192.168.100.11 (12 Jul 2007 13:12:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@convenimus.net NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:12:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: slight irritation using digest (from the ports) X-BeenThere: freebsd-security@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Security issues \[members-only posting\]" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2007 13:44:26 -0000 On Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:26:44 +0200 Johan van Selst wrote: > You have included the trailing newline in your hash calculation; > the example in the article did not do this: Richt now I feel a bit like Homer Simpson: DOH! Great, I could of thought auf that by myself, but once again, finding the problem was like finding an elephant through a microscope. Thanks for straightening me out! :-) > echo The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog | openssl dgst -whirlpool Did you install a port with an extended openssl or is there some trick to this? My manpage for openssl doesn't even include sha256, only md2, md5, mdc2, rmd160, sha (which will probably be sha-0) and sha1. Did I miss something? Regards Chris