Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:54:49 -0800 From: Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=c3=ada?= <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com>, Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: pkg-fallout mails Message-ID: <566235D9.5070103@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <CAGwOe2Zf_fKFZatNc2qxEg8BY--_Y2mc6w3eZu6-xdRQ_aKZkg@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGwOe2ZB-KVBHx8w03aXHxo2rbfYruw3i45ZSKZrvL3v64%2BQMA@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2ZHR8u7O7RCCqkcxyR9LeYHHrtaGzj-fOi6dQE8z%2B6ZTQ@mail.gmail.com> <564C4F8E.40007@FreeBSD.org> <CAGwOe2YXwPU53BPJxiTktGBYOPYTPumVuyyz85uFmD%2BjfSK3RQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAGwOe2Zf_fKFZatNc2qxEg8BY--_Y2mc6w3eZu6-xdRQ_aKZkg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --p1D0QUEqH8WBwJ2U2xq5THMvGu6WDphXq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/25/2015 2:33 AM, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:46 AM, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa > <fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 11:14 AM, Matthew Seaman <matthew@freebsd.org>= wrote: >>> On 2015/11/18 07:04, Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa wrote: >>>> !!! Jail is newer than host. (Jail: 1100090, Host: 1100085) !!! >>>> !!! This is not supported. !!! >>>> !!! Host kernel must be same or newer than jail. !!! >>>> !!! Expect build failures. !!! >>>> >>>> >>>> Can anyone please say if this is expected? Is anyone running >>>> tests/changing things in the ports building infrastructure? I could >>>> just ignore the mails, but I never received so many of these before.= >>> >>> This warning appears on pretty much all pkg-fallout e-mails for HEAD.= >>> It is a red-herring, and has nothing at all to do with why the e-mail= is >>> being sent. It's just a warning: the host and jail versions are >>> sufficiently close there is no actual conflict between the system ker= nel >>> and the jail's userland even though that userland is more recent. >> >> Thanks for the explanation! I should probably tweak the message and logic a bit to be less scary and normal. It is mostly for people trying to build head packages from a 10 kernel which is easily not supported and usually results in obscure failures like 'why is rm or this other basic tool not working?'. Even on head these kinds of things have happened but it is very rare. The last was due to capsicum changes a few years ago. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --p1D0QUEqH8WBwJ2U2xq5THMvGu6WDphXq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWYjXZAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPY6IIAKVLL0NSejbZhx0v6esrvMhl vDekZ+zV2s6R70wedTdMJOIn4QYggaInM6hsu7govRzvzuvVBhQ2IPvBtxKW2wIi zQC9ohJoaizuMyKdLyO2E1JZhphkhXE328S3UhVAGYjWEN+QMgOUvfsZoDiIwGPf xK70DFc3rYu7WDU/QY1sysfXETTzem/nzzF9sQoG7ent5dzfdUraTI0Fs+9lVLEY nFQL/mpy4O8QlwxSdMjGIpjv8nDYu1uNmlgvrk+W1whWARNuVyFrJT4wGyfkp6Mg 0YaoxYfsGuLAwRZgipMl76qESUP/FixmFetEBXs0FBTdeCDyAdL4Z9rojPLwc3Q= =RaEC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --p1D0QUEqH8WBwJ2U2xq5THMvGu6WDphXq--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?566235D9.5070103>