Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:33:52 -0600 From: "Neil Camara" <neil-on-mobile@restricted.dyndns.org> To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wi0 wi_seek timeout Message-ID: <20040219213352.82858.qmail@restricted.dyndns.org> In-Reply-To: <20040219154945.GB12742@pir.net> References: <20040219035058.7296.qmail@restricted.dyndns.org> <20040219064241.18783.qmail@restricted.dyndns.org> <6.0.1.1.2.20040219102338.03da9e90@gid.co.uk> <20040219154945.GB12742@pir.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This means that if I want to continue my FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE to act as AP, then I would just upgrade to 1.5.6 and not 1.7.4? Did I understood you guys? Thanks. Peter Radcliffe writes: > Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> probably said: >> I've had success with 1.1.1/1.5.6 on that card. ISTR that someone was >> talking of problems with 1.7.4 (hit the list archives). > > I see markedly better client behaviour with 1.7.4 or 1.8.0 over 1.5.6. > The only problem I've had with 1.7.6 is it won't do hostap with -stable. > > P. > > -- > pir > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mobile > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mobile-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040219213352.82858.qmail>