Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2004 04:32:11 +0100 (BST) From: Chris Hedley <cbh-freebsd-current@groups.chrishedley.com> To: Ryan Sommers <ryans@gamersimpact.com> Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Crash with new bind/host cmds on -CURRENT (poss. runq_remove?) Message-ID: <20041020042948.H866@teapot.cbhnet> In-Reply-To: <4175C541.2080703@gamersimpact.com> References: <20041018202949.J866@teapot.cbhnet> <20041019160026.GB55255@xor.obsecurity.org> <20041020003333.H866@teapot.cbhnet> <4175BABD.70602@gamersimpact.com> <20041020023318.T866@teapot.cbhnet> <4175C541.2080703@gamersimpact.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Ryan Sommers wrote: > Chris Hedley wrote: >> On Tue, 19 Oct 2004, Ryan Sommers wrote: >> >>> Are you using PREEMPT with SHED_ULE? Or is this just SHED_ULE without >>> preemption? >> >> I have both SCHED_ULE and PREEMPTION set in my config file, which I've >> included as an attachment "just in case" (please don't laugh at how scruffy >> it's become!) > > Err, my fault for not looking at it. I would disable PREEMPT if you're going > to use SCHED_ULE. It's known to be pretty unstable. If you want preemption > I'd switch to SCHED_4BSD. For the life of me I can't recall why I turned on PREEMPTION; I doubt if it was just "it seemed like a good idea at the time", but I'll turn it off again anyway and give it another go! Chris.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041020042948.H866>