From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 20 20:02:12 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E807516A41A for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from staale@kristoffersen.ws) Received: from smtp.bluecom.no (smtp.bluecom.no [193.75.75.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A384913C46E for ; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from staale@kristoffersen.ws) Received: from eschew.pusen.org (unknown [193.69.145.10]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.bluecom.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4073E12C662; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:02:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from chiller by eschew.pusen.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1IByg4-0007WD-Q7; Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:02:16 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 22:02:16 +0200 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?St=E5le?= Kristoffersen To: Jack Vogel Message-ID: <20070720200216.GB22877@eschew.pusen.org> References: <20070716213425.GB19282@eschew.pusen.org> <20070718041159.GC37935@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20070718044700.GE37935@cdnetworks.co.kr> <20070718124350.GA25799@eschew.pusen.org> <46A06D8D.1070604@unsane.co.uk> <20070720122443.GA29372@eschew.pusen.org> <2a41acea0707200810n21843c76s9b0f4f37ef92722f@mail.gmail.com> <20070720184550.GA22877@eschew.pusen.org> <2a41acea0707201203o28722443v8ab2bc9a8450bb92@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2a41acea0707201203o28722443v8ab2bc9a8450bb92@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: Vince , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow networkperformance in current? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Jul 2007 20:02:13 -0000 On 2007-07-20 at 12:03, Jack Vogel wrote: > The stack being capable, as I said, of delivering the goods says nothing > of the driver, what NIC is it? Did you ask if anyone else with that > hardware is seeing a problem, I came into this thread somewhat late. I'm running this nic: re0: port 0x7e00-0x7eff mem 0xfd3ff000-0xfd3fffff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci3 But I'm guessing it's not the NIC or its drivers fault, because I get the same performance (with 100% CPU) using localhost. -- Ståle Kristoffersen staalebk@ifi.uio.no