From owner-freebsd-alpha  Wed Jun 20 11:10:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-alpha@freebsd.org
Received: from duke.cs.duke.edu (duke.cs.duke.edu [152.3.140.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87F237B403
	for <freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 20 Jun 2001 11:10:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
Received: from grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (grasshopper.cs.duke.edu [152.3.145.30])
	by duke.cs.duke.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA14656;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:10:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from gallatin@localhost)
	by grasshopper.cs.duke.edu (8.11.3/8.9.1) id f5KIA3Z40780;
	Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from gallatin@cs.duke.edu)
From: Andrew Gallatin <gallatin@cs.duke.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <15152.59131.711800.873825@grasshopper.cs.duke.edu>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2001 14:10:03 -0400 (EDT)
To: Bosko Milekic <bmilekic@technokratis.com>
Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: vx, lge, nge, dc, rl, sf, sis, sk, vr, wb users please TEST
In-Reply-To: <20010620135939.A34888@technokratis.com>
References: <20010619191602.A28591@technokratis.com>
	<200106200224.TAA24251@usr05.primenet.com>
	<20010619232624.A29829@technokratis.com>
	<3B304ADF.C5131399@mindspring.com>
	<20010620123029.A34452@technokratis.com>
	<3B30D941.6AE93443@mindspring.com>
	<20010620135939.A34888@technokratis.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-alpha@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-alpha.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-alpha>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-alpha>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org


Bosko Milekic writes:
 > 
 >   Before I go into this [the topic seems to have diverged a little], has
 > anybody gotten around to testing (or has the hardware to do the testing
 > required?) - if some of you guys are stuck with the fact that you have the
 > hardware but don't run -CURRENT, please let me know - I could generate an
 > equivalent patch for -STABLE, with a little work.

I assume you're just looking for an unaligned access panic on the
first bit of IP traffic?

Drew

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-alpha" in the body of the message