From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 20 03:21:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79AFB16A4DD; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:21:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07DDC43D55; Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:21:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from zion.baldwin.cx (zion.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.7]) (authenticated bits=0) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k6K3La9I070966; Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:21:37 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: hideo Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:19:57 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060717170446.22himtda6848w8cw@netchild.homeip.net> <200607191639.06337.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060719214030.GA35704@lastamericanempire.com> In-Reply-To: <20060719214030.GA35704@lastamericanempire.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200607192319.57686.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH authentication, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (server.baldwin.cx [192.168.0.1]); Wed, 19 Jul 2006 23:21:40 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1609/Wed Jul 19 08:13:27 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: amd64@freebsd.org, Alexander Leidinger , y.pankov@irbis.net.ru, freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: I need linuxolator testers with an amd64 machine (easy but time consuming) X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 03:21:45 -0000 On Wednesday 19 July 2006 17:40, hideo wrote: > John Baldwin (Wed 07/19/06 16:39): > > On Wednesday 19 July 2006 16:18, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > Quoting Alexander Leidinger (Wed, 19 Jul 2006 > > 22:13:08 +0200): > > > > > > > Quoting Alexander Leidinger (Wed, 19 Jul 2006 > > 22:09:03 +0200): > > > > > > > > > Quoting Alexander Leidinger (Wed, 19 Jul 2006 > > 20:31:59 +0200): > > > > > > > > > > > Ugh... I try to get the port updated to it can be installed with the > > > > > > new default linux base port... in the mean time someone should dig out > > > > > > an old package and extract the program out of it... > > > > > > > > > > Done. Until the package is build (because of a build time conflict with > > > > > the default linux base port you need to install the package if you have > > > > > the default linux base port installed), I have a package for -current > > > > > at http://www.leidinger.net/FreeBSD/ for download. > > > > > > > > Uhm... this is an i386 package... I change it to use the new > > > > IA32_BINARY_PACKAGE stuff... wait an hour after this mail and it should > > > ^^^^^^^ > > > PORT > > > > be available. > > > > > > I think I spoke too fast... can someone explain me please, if i386 > > > packages can be installed on amd64? The IA32_BINARY_PORT stuff doesn't > > > deal with packages... > > > > > > And can an i386 linux_kdump package work on amd64 and decode the amd64 > > > ktrace.out? > > > > Since amd64 can only run i386 Linux binaries for now the ktrace.out should be > > processed by an i386 linux_kdump. > > The output using the latest linux_kdump is all very similar to this for > bash: > > 35775 ktrace RET #0 -1 errno 100096 Unknown error: 100096 > linux_kdump: data too short What is the previous line? That is, what syscall did it invoke that returned this error? -- John Baldwin