From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 25 07:05:10 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: net@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A2B16A41F for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 07:05:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (cell.sick.ru [217.72.144.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C7843D48 for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 07:05:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cell.sick.ru (glebius@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j9P757ZD071714 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:05:08 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from glebius@localhost) by cell.sick.ru (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j9P757qL071713; Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:05:07 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: cell.sick.ru: glebius set sender to glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:05:07 +0400 From: Gleb Smirnoff To: Mao Shou Yan Message-ID: <20051025070507.GA41520@cell.sick.ru> References: <31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C35521828495B@bjngsmail01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <31021C278A7A6B4AB95E9A085C35521828495B@bjngsmail01> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Cc: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: em(4) patch for test X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 07:05:10 -0000 On Tue, Oct 25, 2005 at 02:55:01PM +0800, Mao Shou Yan wrote: M> NO, I didn't encounter a lot if input errors on 4.11. M> But I met a lot if input errors on 5.4. And I don't know why? M> Is this for so many CSWs( systat -vmstat 1) or any other reason? M> BTW, New patch loops in em_intr() like linux' NAPI. If we apply new M> patch, polling is necessary yet? If you encounter problems on 5.4, then you should try the patch. The patch doesn't affects polling users, only those who use interrupt driven mode. P.S. Please don't top quote. -- Totus tuus, Glebius. GLEBIUS-RIPN GLEB-RIPE