From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 23 06:52:01 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09DF91083105 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:52:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp07.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F6CC83B82 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lbartoletti@tuxfamily.org) Received: from imac-de-loic.home ([90.114.93.43]) by mwinf5d30 with ME id SWrp1y00L0w8FgA03WrpeM; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 08:51:50 +0200 X-ME-Helo: imac-de-loic.home X-ME-Auth: YmFydG9sZXR0aS5sb2ljQG9yYW5nZS5mcg== X-ME-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 08:51:50 +0200 X-ME-IP: 90.114.93.43 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Rainer Hurling , pgsql@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Lo=c3=afc_Bartoletti?= Subject: postgis status Message-ID: <00705d89-f663-ada9-56b2-2230c758eb13@tuxfamily.org> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 08:51:49 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.13; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Language: fr X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 06:52:01 -0000 Hi, The new version of postgis (2.5) is coming soon. I'm preparing the tests to integrate it into our ports. I take this opportunity to ask you a general question about the status of postgis in our ports. As for postgresql, with each postgis version, we have a port (databases/postgis2(1,2,3,4 and soon 5). I proposed some time ago, to be able to manage these versions with a USE ( https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213038 ) which from my point of view allows to simplify dependencies as for pgrouting ( https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=225264 ) I wonder if we should continue to maintain all versions and in this case, we should go ahead with the framework (or other ideas?). Another possibility is simply to delete the different versions and only propose the last one; I will prepare the patch for the postgis25 release. What do you think of that? Regards Loïc