Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 9 Feb 2015 15:22:42 +0100
From:      Andre Albsmeier <andre@fbsd.ata.myota.org>
To:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc:        andre@fbsd.ata.myota.org
Subject:   [unionfs] deadlocking a 9-STABLE machine with two unionfs mounts onto the same mountpoint
Message-ID:  <20150209142242.GA8734@schlappy>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Retrying here as -fs didn't show up any results...

----- Forwarded message -----

I can reliably deadlock a 9.3-STABLE by the following procedure:

Let's assume that /tmp is a standard swap-backed file system
already. First let's set up what we need:

mkdir /tmp/1 /tmp/2
mount -v -t unionfs /tmp/1 /usr/local
mount -v -t unionfs /tmp/2 /usr/local

No let's lock the system:

mkdir /tmp/2/bla
while :; do
  echo go
  tar -cC /usr/src/etc -f - . | tar -xpC /tmp/2/bla -f -
done

It survives about 3 or 4 rounds, sometimes more, sometimes
only 2. It is important to use tar to copy the stuff. If
we replace the tar line by e.g.

cp -pR /usr/src/etc/* /tmp/2/bla

things are all well.

The system doesn't lock up entirely, you can move the mouse
and ping it but no fs access is possible anymore. One can
switch to the console and enter the debugger but a reboot
with ctrl-alt-del doesn't work...

The interesting part is that all this worked pretty well on
9-STABLE until approx. 2 months ago. But nothing had been
committed to unionfs for a long time so I really have no
idea what's going on.

It also reminds us of

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161511

but this stuff had been merged to 9-STABLE already...

Anything I can do to get this fixed?

----- End forwarded message -----



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150209142242.GA8734>