From owner-freebsd-ports Sat May 4 7: 2:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from gw.nectar.cc (gw.nectar.cc [208.42.49.153]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAECC37B416; Sat, 4 May 2002 07:02:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (madman.nectar.cc [10.0.1.111]) by gw.nectar.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D41723; Sat, 4 May 2002 09:02:27 -0500 (CDT) Received: from madman.nectar.cc (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g44E2RA1073221; Sat, 4 May 2002 09:02:27 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from nectar@madman.nectar.cc) Received: (from nectar@localhost) by madman.nectar.cc (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g44E2Q9Q073220; Sat, 4 May 2002 09:02:26 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 09:02:26 -0500 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" To: Anders Nordby , Udo Schweigert Cc: Luigi Rizzo , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile Message-ID: <20020504140225.GB73078@madman.nectar.cc> References: <200205041331.g44DV7B82036@freefall.freebsd.org> <20020504134821.GA73078@madman.nectar.cc> <20020504135223.GA7869@totem.fix.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020504135223.GA7869@totem.fix.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Url: http://www.nectar.cc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 03:52:23PM +0200, Anders Nordby wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 08:48:21AM -0500, Jacques A. Vidrine wrote: > >> Use ncurses instead of slang by default, because of slang "out of a box" > >> issues. > > What was the issue/were the issues? They are not described in the PR. > > See PR ports/37725, which it refers to. Thanks, I missed that reference. Hmpf, my experience is completely the opposite. I use over 83 `color' settings with mutt using slang. Before the port defaulted to slang, I would manually specify WITH_SLANG because the ncurses version did not do colors well. (on -CURRENT and -STABLE) I just tested mutt with slang with the `color' definitions in ports/37725 on rxvt (TERM=rxvt) and xterm (TERM=xterm-color) on 4.5-STABLE, and as expected it works fine. Did the maintainer or committer actually test to see if Luigi's claim is accurate? I would like to see this resolved before 4.6-RELEASE so that we have a working mutt on the CDs. Cheers, -- Jacques A. Vidrine http://www.nectar.cc/ NTT/Verio SME . FreeBSD UNIX . Heimdal Kerberos jvidrine@verio.net . nectar@FreeBSD.org . nectar@kth.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message