Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:32:52 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 192228] New port: databases/bucardo Message-ID: <bug-192228-13-Ui30lUAQJ8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-192228-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-192228-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192228 John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |marino@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #5 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> --- Michelle, do those test commands include "make check-plist" and "make stage-qa" ? The DEVELOPER=yes is fading from site. Poudriere testport (and poudriere bulk -t) run these stage-qa checks and that's what generally fails, even for ports that passed on Redports. Vanilla is right in saying poudriere is the gold standard, but if you don't use it, you should at least use "make check-plist" John -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-192228-13-Ui30lUAQJ8>