From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jul 29 16:32:54 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E77C80A
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4644F25CB
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:32:54 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.8/8.14.8) with ESMTP id s6TGWsdr064927
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:32:54 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 192228] New port: databases/bucardo
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:32:52 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: marino@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc
Message-ID: <bug-192228-13-Ui30lUAQJ8@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-192228-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-192228-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 16:32:54 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192228

John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |marino@FreeBSD.org

--- Comment #5 from John Marino <marino@FreeBSD.org> ---
Michelle, do those test commands include "make check-plist" and "make stage-qa"
?

The DEVELOPER=yes is fading from site.
Poudriere testport (and poudriere bulk -t) run these stage-qa checks and that's
what generally fails, even for ports that passed on Redports.

Vanilla is right in saying poudriere is the gold standard, but if you don't use
it, you should at least use "make check-plist" 

John

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.