From owner-freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org Fri May 20 06:31:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-pkgbase@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B3FB41FB4; Fri, 20 May 2016 06:31:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan_partelly@rdsor.ro) Received: from mail.rdsor.ro (mail.rdsor.ro [193.231.238.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEAD01DE8; Fri, 20 May 2016 06:30:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan_partelly@rdsor.ro) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (unknown [82.77.55.168]) by mail.rdsor.ro (Postfix) with ESMTP id B421A1F91E; Fri, 20 May 2016 09:22:46 +0300 (EEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.2 \(3112\)) Subject: Re: Followup on packaging base with pkg(8) From: Dan Partelly In-Reply-To: <20160519203126.GO3335@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 09:22:46 +0300 Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-pkgbase@FreeBSD.org, re@FreeBSD.org, secteam@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: References: <20160519203126.GO3335@FreeBSD.org> To: Glen Barber X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3112) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-pkgbase@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Packaging the FreeBSD base system." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 May 2016 06:31:00 -0000 Thanks for the work you put in this major feature. Could we please get a full list of the issues which surfaced, quirks, and other worth to mention notes ? I believe its important. > On 19 May 2016, at 23:31, Glen Barber wrote: > > Despite the schedule adjustment for 11.0-RELEASE to allow additional > time to resolve several issues prior to the merge to head, too many > issues remained. Following the merge to head, many more issues were > discovered, some resolved, but many without a clear, non-disruptive > solution. > > Given the state of this highly-disruptive change to the base system, we > need to take the best interest of the FreeBSD community into primary > consideration, as a whole.