From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Apr 10 23:58:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7606AB0BAFB for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x229.google.com (mail-ob0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C89E1DB2 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:58:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ob0-x229.google.com with SMTP id j9so100913349obd.3 for ; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:58:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=DJBiCOql1wS4bXW1ZRZzapU40/RUm78Op+5Zk4QNvtI=; b=O/OeDYg0ZCwjJwKNX+zOAsrr4af7pf4oDa4V4/nmzu4vZifjAeZ4Co1D/e1Akfh6lI JxjuBzvntmEwEMaa35rL8b39HVAWQM2YP9luZPcYeHEnsHKATdeuKSIK7tpMG2hWDUtO 4+2uH0CAa/v4+2CsNryTOIa0gdTFpf9pxrm6N5EECTVoq/kNG0dZu2Ts0DGS/JN2qcA0 T8V5w+Ex8NC5CIR6RQlwTXzoB02SvtfsYk0YMbAAte1rqlAGLHXGhLSi8U8Uea9xTZhr B7hpwDJg9AfZUR2FI4scYL+tKqIF6OgrPNTeR/ODwDJjxrw4brhP/WgzAvRsgailvbxP 22fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=DJBiCOql1wS4bXW1ZRZzapU40/RUm78Op+5Zk4QNvtI=; b=l1bgAW6VxSO+tnAj5m+iEqKBErN9jCK2UCVVh/fxCgVyvvLxHkieMATKO/E7PCfFRm /h6GK8DGg9KnYgJ/0xrzmXmLCYhnuVF0LXOk7+W14yO/p6EIyNrOl79xHlAyLmKqaj4G SAvrtmk6A6XcBhnFPduAXhtLW5EXPyw/jZ6eij10DoJrI5hpWEeU1FLhB9bkAZEl52+n FpWIQ/uguLv1e3HadJSysF6ZRzS/54+bx+wRBFT936M7C1jKplXoealNdjJvRs+8qplM Okc7u0DkQCyTxxrhb+UCPkey6HpUvThctJdr3bX1CRGDvLbaalYkuXnTGWlwd5dKBxmJ uv5A== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJK7JNaw5wB/MXTaodK0vAOLbFsDz2s085kbGQVtO13z5Zf7lXwaNNHTsJLhPtB6C50TIyeDmYgVBhj+vw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.85.199 with SMTP id j7mr9233575obz.4.1460332738554; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:58:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.45.194 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:58:58 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <570ADDBF.1050308@hiwaay.net> References: <570ACDB6.1020703@hiwaay.net> <20160410230338.GB24900@server.rulingia.com> <570ADDBF.1050308@hiwaay.net> Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 16:58:58 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: 'porting' AMD compiler suite From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: "William A. Mahaffey III" Cc: "FreeBSD ports list !!!!" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.21 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Apr 2016 23:58:59 -0000 On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:10 PM, William A. Mahaffey III wrote: > On 04/10/16 18:09, Peter Jeremy wrote: > >> On 2016-Apr-10 17:09:04 -0453, "William A. Mahaffey III" >> wrote: >> >>> configure process completed OK, but created a Makefile w/ what seems to >>> be a bunch of linuxisms in conditionals to allow compilation for >>> different architectures, see attached orig-Makefile. >>> >> Have you tried using gmake, rather than the base make? >> >> > > Hmmmm .... No, I didn't :-/ .... Did I mention pilot error ? I thought the > system make was a version of gmake, but apparently not, right ? Thanks, > I'll try that & see how it goes .... > > -- > > William A. Mahaffey III > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > "The M1 Garand is without doubt the finest implement of war > ever devised by man." > -- Gen. George S. Patton Jr. > > _______________________________________________ > > FreeBSD make and GNU make are different species ( means not compatible ) . If you compare building of GCC in FreeBSD and Linux , you may model building of Open64 in FreeBSD with respect to building in Linux . If I were you , I would not work on Open64 because GCC is much better than Open64 with respect to my opinion . In Linux , I have checked Open64 for using it , but I have abandoned that idea , because at least it does not have 128 bit floating point numbers ( if it is not included yet ) . It may be said that it is abandoned : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open64 http://developer.amd.com/tools-and-sdks/cpu-development/x86-open64-compiler-suite/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/files/open64/ https://sourceforge.net/projects/open64/files/open64/Open64-5.0/ http://www.open64.net/ Mehmet Erol Sanliturk