From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Oct  2 13:01:43 1997
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id NAA19129
          for stable-outgoing; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 13:01:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id NAA19113
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 13:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harmony [10.0.0.6] 
	by rover.village.org with esmtp (Exim 1.71 #1)
	id 0xGrRE-0000Ex-00; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 14:01:32 -0600
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.8.7/8.8.3) with ESMTP id OAA03804; Thu, 2 Oct 1997 14:02:25 -0600 (MDT)
Message-Id: <199710022002.OAA03804@harmony.village.org>
To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Subject: Re: CVSUP vs. SNAPS 
Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@GndRsh.aac.dev.com>,
        andrsn@andrsn.stanford.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 02 Oct 1997 10:01:00 PDT."
		<11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com> 
References: <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com>  
Date: Thu, 02 Oct 1997 14:02:24 -0600
From: Warner Losh <imp@village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In message <11918.875811660@time.cdrom.com> "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes:
: > Please, not again, don't duplicate the errors of your past handling
: > of this.
: > 
: > The sequence of commits should be something that creates
: > 
: > 2.2-STABLE (where we are today)
: > 2.2.5-BETA (for while we are in BETA on the branch)
: > 2.2.5-RELEASE (when you finally roll the puppy up)
: > 2.2.5-STABLE (after you roll the release).
: 
: That would be totally and utterly bogus.

Why?  It makes perfect sense to me.

Warner