From owner-freebsd-hackers  Mon May 19 09:40:38 1997
Return-Path: <owner-hackers>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA02111
          for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 19 May 1997 09:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from phaeton.artisoft.com (phaeton.Artisoft.COM [198.17.250.50])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id JAA01892;
          Mon, 19 May 1997 09:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from terry@localhost) by phaeton.artisoft.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id JAA24310; Mon, 19 May 1997 09:30:17 -0700
From: Terry Lambert <terry@lambert.org>
Message-Id: <199705191630.JAA24310@phaeton.artisoft.com>
Subject: Re: Variable initialization
To: bde@zeta.org.au (Bruce Evans)
Date: Mon, 19 May 1997 09:30:17 -0700 (MST)
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, j@uriah.heep.sax.de, core@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <199705191131.VAA13078@godzilla.zeta.org.au> from "Bruce Evans" at May 19, 97 09:31:41 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> With old compilers, it was a pessimization to initalize variables
> unnecessarily or long before they are used.  With modern compilers,
> it defeats automatic checking for uninitialized variables and may
> still prevent some optimizations.  A wrongly initialized variable
> is worse than an initialized one since it can't be checked for.

Won't an incorrect initialization become ovbious when the code
fails to function?


					Terry Lambert
					terry@lambert.org
---
Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my present
or previous employers.