Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 29 Oct 2014 16:00:29 -0700
From:      Garrett Cooper <yaneurabeya@gmail.com>
To:        Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@freebsd.org>, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>, "bugmeister@freebsd.org" <bugmeister@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, Eitan Adler <lists@eitanadler.com>, freebsd-current Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Tracking enhancements/wishlist items (was "junior kernel tasks")
Message-ID:  <A1C8E040-C918-4893-9B5E-9DC924B3E4FA@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20141029205336.GA1303@medusa.sysfault.org>
References:  <20141025204536.GD19066@dft-labs.eu> <201410281321.31986.jhb@freebsd.org> <20141028213526.Horde.WmTRslgo-hNbim44HjeQAA6@webmail.df.eu> <20141028221413.GF26796@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <CAF6rxgmoWphdydvsOMbqkjdv%2B3ECFzs7jSjMS6X29=f97mpNxQ@mail.gmail.com> <20141029205336.GA1303@medusa.sysfault.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

> On Oct 29, 2014, at 13:53, Marcus von Appen <mva@FreeBSD.org> wrote:

...

If we are going to do that, the area however should be
> separate from typical "bugs", so people do not confuse wishes with bugs
> and vice versa.  Also, to avoid long and misleading comment trails, we
> would need the ability to hide/remove errornous (bug-related) comments
> in the wishlist (a feature wished for independent of this, but a
> necessary prerequisite [probably coming soon]).
>=20
> Wishlist items thus should not belong to a currently existing product or
> component, but should be clearly classified in an own product and/or
> component category.
>=20
> Except from that, what else would be required and desired to have a
> suitable wishlist? The bug tracker right now features:
>=20
> - tags
> - keywords
> - links to internal bugs/items (dependencies and blockers)
> - links to external systems
> - links to svn commits and reviews
> - attachments
> - flags to request/confirm/deny things

At $work we use Enhancement in the severity field to generally denote these k=
inds of items. However, we could always use wishlist in the Keywords field.

All I ask for is a centralized place to track this or easy way to look this u=
p instead of 10+ wiki pages and doc pages full of outdated/incorrect materia=
l.=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A1C8E040-C918-4893-9B5E-9DC924B3E4FA>