Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 14:46:57 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 245458] New port: sysutils/lsxo ls clone with libxo support Message-ID: <bug-245458-7788-RqqRqEO7Ta@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-245458-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-245458-7788@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D245458 Phil Shafer <phil@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |phil@freebsd.org --- Comment #1 from Phil Shafer <phil@freebsd.org> --- Should we instead just add libxo support directly to "ls"? The whole point= of using libxo is to have a single code path that supplies all output, so maki= ng a cloned command is the wrong direction. Is there something missing from lib= xo that makes this difficult for "ls"? Thanks, Phil --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-245458-7788-RqqRqEO7Ta>