From owner-freebsd-chat Fri Aug 11 20: 6: 6 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from sanson.reyes.somos.net (freyes.static.inch.com [216.223.199.224]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47F237B874 for ; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 20:06:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from fran@reyes.somos.net) Received: from tomasa (tomasa.reyes.somos.net [10.0.0.11]) by sanson.reyes.somos.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id WAA14090; Fri, 11 Aug 2000 22:57:27 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from fran@reyes.somos.net) Message-Id: <200008120257.WAA14090@sanson.reyes.somos.net> From: "Francisco Reyes" To: "Nicole Harrington." , "Terry Lambert" Cc: "(Mike Tancsa)" , "chat@FreeBSD.ORG" Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 23:06:58 -0400 Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" X-Mailer: PMMail 2000 Professional (2.10.2010) For Windows 98 (4.10.2222) In-Reply-To: <200008120009.RAA05661@usr06.primenet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 3ware IDE Raid. SCSI killer? Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sat, 12 Aug 2000 00:09:34 +0000 (GMT), Terry Lambert wrote: >...as a backhand reference to the fact that IDE dtill does not >support concurrent outstanding I/O via tagged command queueing. I could be wrong, but I though I read some reference to tagged queing on the 3ware site. >But the fact is that there are IDE RAID controllers, even though >I personally think that a server will have much more need of >concurrency than a desktop. The issue is that many times a server is only used by 5 to users at a time. In this case concurrency is not so much of an issue. francisco Moderator of the Corporate BSD list http://www.egroups.com/group/BSD_Corporate To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message