From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 10 22:43:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C201A16A8DB for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-0-0-cust107.cdif.cable.ntl.com [81.104.168.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A461E43D48 for ; Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrirw.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.10.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168) (Exim 4.62 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1FdxOt-00021z-09; Wed, 10 May 2006 23:43:28 +0100 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/11.2.3.060209 Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:43:22 +0100 From: Ceri Davies To: martinko , Message-ID: Thread-Topic: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org Thread-Index: AcZ0gyP9YmkRVeB2EdqadAAUUSJIlg== In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: New freebsd logo on freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 22:43:33 -0000 On 10/5/06 23:37, "martinko" wrote: > Ceri Davies wrote: >> On 9/5/06 15:57, "wc_fbsd@xxiii.com" wrote: >> >>> At 07:01 AM 5/9/2006, you wrote: >>>> I have to agree with the original poster. The logo is crap, and so >>>> is the font they've started to use since the announcement of >>>> FreeBSD6.1-RELEASE. At >>> Me Too. At first I thought it was just a petty complaint. >>> >>> But if you're trying to "sell" FreeBSD to a boss or customer, a >>> serious, business-like web site surely helps. The new one seems to >>> borrow too much from the "hax0r" community's appearance. >>> >>> And the font overflows and looks like complete shit on my >>> browser; usually this would just be blamed on using a "Non Microsoft >>> Browser" (FireFox on windoze) but until we have IE for FBSD, it seems >>> a legit complaint. >> >> The font overflows? We didn't change the font. >> >> Ceri > > well, i would expect the page to scale somehow better when i try to > increase font size in mozilla. but if it can't even render properly when > i choose "officially" via "large" text size option right on the page, > then i must conclude it's not good and not ready for the public. :-( That's an issue for www@ -> over there. It also has nothing to do with the logo. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Moliere